
-
-
-
How strange the contradiction is between the modern “reprivatization” of everyday life, and the “globalization” which is being thrust into the very heart of private life by mass media. On one side of the picture the horizon shrinks, with everything turned back on the family and the self. Turn the picture, and we see a limitless expanse where the idea of the “world” already implies its supersession. But this “picture” cannot be summed simply as something with two contradicting sides. It is misleading to think that we can look at one side, then the other. The crucial thing is to seize the dramatic and conflictual interpretation of each “side” of the picture. And the picture is just a metaphor for a technical operation, itself abstract, by which the movement from one to other can be grasped.
-
-
This generalized and disjointed determination has to make do with the transformation and abstract transposition of an everyday life which has itself been reduced to a “private” abstraction: verbalism, rhetoric, moralism and
aesthetics.
Whatever we can formulate as thought has been made into a reality “for us” by praxis, and it is therefore not the action of some kind of independent and externalized consciousness which internalizes it; it has been transformed into consciousness by praxis and the movement of praxis.
-
-


